SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer‐reviewed journals in 2012
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer‐reviewed journals in 2012 (2014)Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitte…Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures (2013)Journal acceptance rates: A c…Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review (2012)Implementation Science six ye…Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery (2010)Fate of manuscripts declined …Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls (2009)Manuscript rejection in ophth…How to get your paper rejected (2008)How to get your paper rejectedTen Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript (2007)Ten Principles to Improve the…Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors (2007)Reasons for Rejection of Manu…Exploring the Relationship Between Impact Factor and Manuscript Rejection Rates in Radiologic Journals1 (2006)Exploring the Relationship Be…A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript (2005)A Systematic Guide to Reviewi…How I Review an Original Scientific Article (2002)How I Review an Original Scie…Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)Reasons Reviewers Reject and …Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Fe…What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Peer Review Is an Effective Screening Process to Evaluate Medical Manuscripts (1994)Peer Review Is an Effective S…THE TRAJECTORY OF REJECTION (1992)THE TRAJECTORY OF REJECTIONFate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. (1991)Fate of manuscripts rejected …HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases (2010)Peer review and the publication process (2016)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Author Perception of Peer Review (2002)The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality (2007)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1985)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey (2019)Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas (2019)And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists (2022)The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses (1965)Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)Limited by our limitations (2019)Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978. (1978)Journal Peer Review (1985)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Peer review and editorial decision-making (1998)Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection Reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (2020)Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research (1998)The problem of appraising qualitative research (2004)Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices (2011)Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines (2012)An integrated approach to universal prevention: Independent and combined effects of PBIS and SEL on youths’ mental health. (2015)Mapping the growing discipline of dissemination and implementation science in health (2017)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)How to Review a Manuscript: A "Down-to-Earth" Approach (2004)Mentoring (2004)How to review a manuscript (2010)Writing It Up: A Step-by-Step Guide to Publication for Beginning Investigators (2005)Handling Manuscript Rejection (2009)Manuscript Rejection (2014)Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups (2023)The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 2001Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts235 cited
  • 1998Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance141 cited
  • 2005A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript128 cited
  • 2013Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures120 cited
  • 2002How I Review an Original Scientific Article117 cited
  • 2007Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors77 cited
  • 1991Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.62 cited
  • 2012Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review60 cited
  • 1994Peer Review Is an Effective Screening Process to Evaluate Medical Manuscripts54 cited
  • 2009Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls43 cited
  • 1992THE TRAJECTORY OF REJECTION34 cited
  • 2010Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery31 cited
  • 2007Ten Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript31 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006
Exploring the Relationship Between Impact Factor and Manuscript Rejection Rates in Radiologic Journals1
30 cited
  • 2008How to get your paper rejected16 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.