SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?
7 references·0 citing·30 second hop
The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight? (2015)The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Go…The effect of the number of seed variables on the performance of Cooke′s classical model (2013)The effect of the number of s…Quantifying scientific uncertainty from expert judgement elicitation (2013)Quantifying scientific uncert…TU Delft expert judgment data base (2007)TU Delft expert judgment data…Reliability and Validity in Expert Judgment (2007)Reliability and Validity in E…A study of expert overconfidence (2007)A study of expert overconfide…Calibration and information in expert resolution; a classical approach (1988)Calibration and information i…Delphi critique : expert opinion, forecasting, and group process (1975)Delphi critique : expert opin…the delphi method: techniques and applications (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management (2018)The benefits of circular economy strategies in urban water facilities (2022)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980 (1982)Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982)Expert judgement elicitation for risk assessments of critical infrastructures (2004)Expert Elicitation: Using the Classical Model to Validate Experts’ Judgments (2017)Structured elicitation of expert judgement for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment in volcanic eruptions (2018)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations (1971)Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science (1992)There is Data, and then there is Data: Only Experimental Evidence will Determine the Utility of Differential Weighting of Expert Judgment (2015)Use of expert knowledge to anticipate the future: Issues, analysis and directions (2016)Mathematically aggregating experts’ predictions of possible futures (2021)Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography (1986)Experts in uncertainty (1993)Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence Modelling (2006)Guidance on Expert Knowledge Elicitation in Food and Feed Safety Risk Assessment (2014)Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies (2015)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Factors which influence decision making in new product evaluation (2004)Predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts (2005)Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: Pitfalls and potential (2018)An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study (2000)Disaggregative policy Delphi (2002)Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in Senior Secondary Vocational Education (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007TU Delft expert judgment data base319 cited
  • 1975Delphi critique : expert opinion, forecasting, and group process237 cited
  • 2007A study of expert overconfidence203 cited
  • 2013Quantifying scientific uncertainty from expert judgement elicitation130 cited
  • 1988Calibration and information in expert resolution; a classical approach83 cited
  • 2013The effect of the number of seed variables on the performance of Cooke′s classical model59 cited
  • 2007Reliability and Validity in Expert Judgment47 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work