SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
16 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research (2000)Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity…Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2002)Psychological debriefing for …North and South: bridging the information gap (2000)North and South: bridging the…Brief psychological interventions ("debriefing") for trauma-related symptoms and the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder.[update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD000560; PMID: 11686967]. [Review] [9 refs] (2000)Brief psychological intervent…Academia and industry: increasingly uneasy bedfellows (2000)Academia and industry: increa…Time to register randomised trials (1999)Time to register randomised t…Time to register randomised trials (1999)Time to register randomised t…Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesNetprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing (1999)Netprints: the next phase in …How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (1998)Discussion Sections in Report…Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews (1997)Pardonable revisions and prot…The CONSORT Statement (1996)The CONSORT StatementImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…The James Lind Initiative (2003)The James Lind InitiativeMinimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study (1997)Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study (1997)A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine (2006)Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries (2014)Increasing the value of health research in the WHO African Region beyond 2015—reflecting on the past, celebrating the present and building the future: a bibliometric analysis (2015)Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress (1979)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey (1995)Traumatic stress: the effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society (1996)A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. (2007)Psychological therapies for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults (2013)Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument (2011)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias (2004)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research (2015)Pharmacotherapy to prevent PTSD: Results from a randomized controlled proof‐of‐concept trial in physically injured patients (2007)Trauma Resilience Training for Police: Psychophysiological and Performance Effects (2008)Work-related post-traumatic stress disorder (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2002Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1,250 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
  • 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited
  • 2000Brief psychological interventions ("debriefing") for trauma-related symptoms and the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder.[update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD000560; PMID: 11686967]. [Review] [9 refs]265 cited
  • 2000North and South: bridging the information gap198 cited
  • 1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited
  • 2000Academia and industry: increasingly uneasy bedfellows143 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing114 cited
  • 1999Time to register randomised trials91 cited
  • 1999Time to register randomised trials45 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1999
Netprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing
44 cited
  • 1997Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews31 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2003The James Lind Initiative25 cited