Is Foundation Content an Archaic Educational Construct? No!

Frank R. Baskind

3 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Social Work Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Work Education and Practice Educational Assessment and Pedagogy Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Abstract

able to see beyond these expectations. This debate presents an opportunity for me to step back and imagine the experi ences of graduates of a social work pro gram that did not use foundation content as an educational construct, review my understanding of the evolution of foun dation content during the last half cen tury, speculate about the downside of this approach, and identify some consid erations and directions for the future. As

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

1969Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction 1995From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education 2001Is Social Work a Profession?2010Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction 1986Feminist Visions for Social Work 1991From teaching to learning 1951Social Work Education in the United States 1958The Nature of Social Work

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.