SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Suitability of three different tools for the assessment of methodological quality in ex post facto studies
16 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Suitability of three different tools for the assessment of methodological quality in ex post facto studies (2012)Suitability of three different tools for …Observational Research Methods (2017)Observational Research MethodsStandards for the preparation and writing of Psychology review articles (2009)Standards for the preparation…RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES" (2009)RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF …A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD). (2008)A systematic and transparent …Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research (2007)Standards for the development…A guide for naming research studies in Psychology (2007)A guide for naming research s…Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systems to rate the strength …Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Intraclass correlations: Uses…A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION (1938)A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELA…Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology (2017)Methodological quality is und…Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (1965)Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: school survey (1999)Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis (1999)Handbook of action research (2006)Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables (2013)Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health (2013)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)The job demands-resources model of burnout. (2001)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. (2009)Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data (2011)Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.23,882 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 1938A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION7,315 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2007A guide for naming research studies in Psychology1,694 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
  • 2009RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES"375 cited
  • 2007Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

291 cited
  • 2017Observational Research Methods212 cited
  • 2008A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).183 cited
  • 2009Standards for the preparation and writing of Psychology review articles134 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology15 cited