Knowledge, Learning, and Organizational Embeddedness

Abstract

This chapter contains section titled: Alice Lam KNOWLEDGE WITHIN THE FIRM: CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION: EXPLICIT TACIT KNOWLEDGE THE ONTOLOGICAL DIMENSION: THE INDIVIDUAL COLLECTIVE FOUR TYPES KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE TYPES AND ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS: FOUR CONTRASTING MODELS OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING ‘PROFESSIONAL BUREAUCRACY’ ‘EMBRAINED KNOWLEDGE’ ‘MACHINE BUREAUCRACY’ ‘ENCODED KNOWLEDGE’ ‘OPERATING ADHOCRACY’ ‘EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE’ ‘J- ORGANIZATION ‘EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE’ THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK: LEARNING AND ORGANIZATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS EDUCATION TRAINING SYSTEMS: ‘NARROW ELITISM’ ‘BROAD- EGALITARIANISM’ LABOUR MARKETS CAREERS: OCCUPATIONAL INTERNAL LABOUR MARKETS OCCUPATIONAL LABOUR MARKET (OLM) INTERNAL LABOUR MARKET (ILM) FOUR CONTRASTING ‘SOCIETAL’ MODELS OF ORGANIZING KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING THE PROFESSIONAL MODEL THE BUREAUCRATIC MODEL THE OCCUPATIONAL COMMUNITY MODEL THE ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNITY MODEL TWO ALTERNATIVE MODELS LEARNING INNOVATION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.