Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación

Abstract

Gender and juror judgment making in a case of r ape. This study assesses the role of gender and juror performance in a case of r ape. The results r eveal that women tend to reach significantly more guilty verdicts. Moreover, the dimension of reliability, the under lying mechanism of judgement making, exhibited significant differences between men and women in the reliability attributed to the evidence. Validity, however, was only mediated by gender in one item of evidence i.e., the importance attributed to the role of the prosecution. The e valuation of cogniti ve activity in the reconstruction of e vents showed that women «process the information in greater depth» and their judgements are based on a «criteria of information integration». Finally, the implications of these findings are discussed, particular ly, in relation to le gal practioners.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.