Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The paradox of performance related pay systems: ‘why do we keep adopting them in the face of evidence that they fail to motivate?’

11 references·5 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management1,869 cited
1992A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System.762 cited
1956Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration421 cited
1994Performing for Pay? The Effects of ‘Merit Pay’ on Motivation in a Public Service244 cited
2008Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England185 cited
1997Evaluating performance-related pay for managers in the National Health Service111 cited
2006The sound of silence: which employers choose no employee voice and why?85 cited
1988Improving management in government : the next steps : report to the Prime Minister66 cited
2000Incentives for change Rewarding performance in national government networks53 cited
1998A Return to Contract? Performance Related Pay in a Public Service41 cited
2007Individual employee voice: renegotiation and performance management in public services25 cited

Cited by

2015Republicanism and the political economy of democracy95 cited
2019Innovating Bureaucracy for a More Capable Government10 cited
2016Do monetary rewards bring happiness? Comparing the impacts of pay-for-performance in the public and private sectors9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016The effect of the Performance Related Pay system on the performance of the employees in Saudi national firms : three case studies2 cited

2018How Do Japanese Employees React to Performance-Related Pay?: The Working of Hybrid Organizations1 cited