Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus

Abstract

Although the term “biofiction” is regularly employed in neo-Victorian criticism it remains curiously under-theorised, without extended discussion of writers’ different approaches to the fictional re-imaginings of nineteenth-century historical subjects, or such representations’ varied ethical or ethically suspect implications. This paper identifies a range of descriptive modes – “celebrity biofiction,” “biofiction of marginalised subjects” and “appropriated biofiction” – to begin to map this neo-Victorian subgenre in greater detail. Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus (2003) is considered as a biofictional case-study and limit-case of bearing after-witness to an historical Other.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.