Article2009

The edge of legitimacy

285 citations0/0 files storedAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the voluntary social and environmental disclosures made in the annual reports of Rothmans Ltd between the years of 1955 and 1999. The first part of the paper focuses on defining legitimacy theory as it has been used in accounting research, extending the current model of legitimacy that predominates, and discussing the potential of a resource‐based approach to testing the theory. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative and quantitative approach to analysing annual report disclosures is presented, and this is one of the few studies to operationalise the variables under study as measures of resource flows. Findings The paper considers legitimacy theory in light of disclosures made by Rothmans. An initial analysis provides qualitative examples of expected attempts to legitimatise the corporation given the threat posed by the smoking and health debate. Further analysis conducted using a quantitative measure of resource flows controlled by one stakeholder group, contradicts those expected when compared with previous studies, and as a result of this an alternative conceptualisation of legitimacy theory is proposed. Research limitations/implications The paper considers one company in one industry and provides evidence from limited stakeholders groups. The results have implications for further research on social and environmental reporting that use a legitimacy framework. Originality/value The paper provides one of the few studies to attempt to measure resource flows in order to proxy stakeholder influence on reporting. This therefore provides an alternative to the more common measures of legitimacy used in previous studies. These have predominantly been based on researcher judgement of the categorised text to determine whether they fit certain “legitimacy” criteria.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 285 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage 2004Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage 1984A resource‐based view of the firm 1984Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.1995Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches 1993Strategic assets and organizational rent 1970Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.2000WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.

Cited by

2012Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures 2019Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy 2012Voluntary Disclosures of Emissions by US Firms 2013Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: The case of Bangladesh 2015Integrated reporting in South Africa: some initial evidence 2016Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.