SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What counts as good evidence
13 references·11 citing·50 second hop
What counts as good evidence (2013)What counts as good evidenceDiscipline and Punish (2013)Discipline and PunishEarly Intervention: The Next Steps (2011)Early Intervention: The Next …Early Intervention, The Next Steps: An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government (2011)Early Intervention, The Next …Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning (2009)Intelligent Policy Making for…The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: A commentary (2008)The need to reform our assess…The Fairy Godmother—and Her Warts (2008)The Fairy Godmother—and Her W…Using evidenceHow research can inform public services (2007)Using evidenceHow research ca…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006)How can systematic reviews in…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence (2003)Quality in qualitative evalua…Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1 (2003)Evidence, hierarchies, and ty…Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion (1980)Knowledge Creep and Decision …What counts as evidence for policy? An analysis of policy actors' perceptions (2022)What counts as evidence for p…A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education (2022)A framework for understanding…Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews? (2021)Systematic Reviews of Systema…Knowledge mobilisation in public service reform: integrating empirical, technical and practical wisdom (2020)Knowledge mobilisation in pub…Improving the use of evidence in legislatures: the case of the UK Parliament (2020)Improving the use of evidence…What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy? (2017)What can evidence-use in prac…Ciencias del comportamiento y política: tiempo de "empujar" la conducta de los gobernantes (2017)Ciencias del comportamiento y…Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: a case study of the ‘Scottish Approach’ (2016)Evidence-based best practice …Can Citizen Science Seriously Contribute to Policy Development? (2016)Can Citizen Science Seriously…Using evidence to improve policy and practice: the UK What Works Centres (2015)Using evidence to improve pol…Communicating marine environmental information to decision makers: Enablers and barriers to use of publications (grey literature) of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment (2014)Communicating marine environm…Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison (1977)Foucault: A Critical Reader (1986)Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975-1995 (2006)Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University (2012)Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research (2013)The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis (2017)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Basics of Qualitative Research (1992)Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. (1998)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis (2016)Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them (2016)The Public and its Problems (1927)The consequences of modernity (1990)Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (2008)Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy (2012)Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: How Do We Combine the Insights of Multiple Theories in Public Policy Studies? (2013)Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011)A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) (2015)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical Basis, Evaluation Design, and Selected Baseline Findings (1996)The Effective Provision of Pre-School Education (EPPE) Project: Final Report: A Longitudinal Study Funded by the DfES 1997-2004 (2004)Parenting self-efficacy, parenting stress and child behaviour before and after a parenting programme (2012)What Predicts a Successful Life? A Life-Course Model of Well-Being (2014)‘The children have only got one education and you have to make sure it's a good one’: parenting and parent–school relations in a neoliberal age (2017)Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada (2009)Wicked Problems (2013)What are shared and social values of ecosystems? (2015)Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis (1982)Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. (1984)Scientific Research in Education (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2013Discipline and Punish2,109 cited
  • 2007Using evidenceHow research can inform public services1,335 cited
  • 2003Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence902 cited
  • 2006How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective860 cited
  • 1980Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion667 cited
  • 2003Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1540 cited
  • 2011Early Intervention: The Next Steps358 cited
  • 2009Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning318 cited
  • 2011Early Intervention, The Next Steps: An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government227 cited
  • 2008The Fairy Godmother—and Her Warts184 cited
  • 2008The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: A commentary47 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: a case study of the ‘Scottish Approach’78 cited
  • 2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What counts as evidence for policy? An analysis of policy actors' perceptions
46 cited
  • 2014Communicating marine environmental information to decision makers: Enablers and barriers to use of publications (grey literature) of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment45 cited
  • 2017What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy?44 cited
  • 2015Using evidence to improve policy and practice: the UK What Works Centres39 cited
  • 2020Improving the use of evidence in legislatures: the case of the UK Parliament36 cited
  • 2022A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education26 cited
  • 2020Knowledge mobilisation in public service reform: integrating empirical, technical and practical wisdom16 cited
  • 2021Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?13 cited
  • 2016Can Citizen Science Seriously Contribute to Policy Development?11 cited
  • 2017Ciencias del comportamiento y política: tiempo de "empujar" la conducta de los gobernantes0 cited