SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Supreme conflict: the inside story of the struggle for control of the United States Supreme Court
0 references·15 citing·36 second hop
Supreme conflict: the inside story of the struggle for control of the United States Supreme Court (2007)Supreme conflict: the inside story of the…Making the Supreme Court (2023)Making the Supreme CourtFrom Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism (2020)From Textbook Pluralism to Mo…Courting the President: How Circuit Court Judges Alter Their Behavior for Promotion to the Supreme Court (2015)Courting the President: How C…Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (2013)Supreme Court Confirmation He…Female and Minority Judicial Nominees: President's Delight and Senators' Dismay? (2011)Female and Minority Judicial …Introduction (2010)IntroductionChoosing Judges in Brazil: Reassessing Legal Transplants from the United States (2010)Choosing Judges in Brazil: Re…9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging (2010)9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclec…5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)5 Judges as Members of Small …3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning (2010)3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mode…2 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging (2010)2 Multiple Constraint Satisfa…16 Expertise of Court Judges (2010)16 Expertise of Court Judges10 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy (2010)10 Judges, Expertise, and Ana…1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry (2010)1 Motivation and Judicial Beh…Politikwissenschaftliche Forschung zum Bundesverfassungsgericht (2009)Politikwissenschaftliche Fors…An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees (2017)The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings (2020)Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court (2022)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges (2020)What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks – Eye Tracking as a Window into Judicial Decision Making (2020)The choices justices make (1997)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)Jobs for Justice(s): Corruption in the Supreme Court of India (2017)Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior (2017)The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior (2021)Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo (1978)Pivotal Politics (1998)Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging (2010)Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts (2015)Keeping Appointments: The Politics of Confirming United States Attorneys (2016)Policy dynamics and electoral uncertainty in the appointments process (2016)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1956)Arbitrator Decision-Making: Unconscious Psychological Influences and What You Can Do About Them (2014)The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion (1951)Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy (2006)Lobbying and Policy Change (2009)Anchoring or Expanding? Gender and Judicial Nominations (2024)A Theory of the Allocation of Time (1965)Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Partisan sorting, fatalism, and Supreme Court legitimacy (2025)Courts and Politics in Southeast Asia (2024)Considering the consequences of increased reliance on judicial assistants: a study on Dutch courts (2014)Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court (2016)Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change74 cited
  • 2015Courting the President: How Circuit Court Judges Alter Their Behavior for Promotion to the Supreme Court74 cited
  • 2011Female and Minority Judicial Nominees: President's Delight and Senators' Dismay?56 cited
  • 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
  • 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
  • 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited
  • 2023Making the Supreme Court20 cited
  • 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging17 cited
  • 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy16 cited
  • 2020From Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism13 cited
  • 2010Choosing Judges in Brazil: Reassessing Legal Transplants from the United States13 cited
  • 2009Politikwissenschaftliche Forschung zum Bundesverfassungsgericht13 cited
  • 20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging11 cited
  • 201016 Expertise of Court Judges1 cited
  • 2010Introduction

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1 cited