SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods
0 references·16 citing·26 second hop
Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods (1990)Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Ac…Can there be a burden of the best explanation? (2018)Can there be a burden of the …The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions (2004)The Impact of Representation …Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation (1996)Why do frequency formats impr…The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses (1996)The purpose of experiments: E…The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks (1996)The implicit use of base rate…The base rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half-empty? (1996)The base rate controversy: Is…Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm? (1996)Studying the use of base rate…Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus (1996)Judgment under uncertainty: E…How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing (1996)How to reconsider the base ra…First things first: What is a base rate? (1996)First things first: What is a…Fallacy and controversy about base rates (1996)Fallacy and controversy about…Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates (1996)Critical and natural sensitiv…Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic (1996)Cognitive algebra versus repr…Base rates, experience, and the big picture (1996)Base rates, experience, and t…David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases (1994)David, Goliath, and reverend …Probabilities in the Courtroom: An Evaluation of the Objections and Policies (1992)Probabilities in the Courtroo…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Evolution and the Theory of Games (1988)Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. (2002)Economists’ and Psychologists’ Experimental Practices: How They Differ, Why They Differ, and How They Could Converge (2003)Social Influences on Individual Decision Making Processes (2004)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Disentangling the Power Bases of Sexual Harassment: Comparing Gender, Age, and Position Power (2000)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Even Bernoulli might have been wrong: a comment on intuitions about sample size (2000)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Use of Base Rate Information as a Function of Experienced Consistency (2005)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness (1985)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)New York University Law Review (2017)The Scientific Image (1980)Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution (1982)Another Look at Reasoning Experiments: Rationality, Normative Models and Conversational Factors (1997)Base-rate sensitivity through implicit learning (2017)Toward a more nuanced understanding of probability estimation biases (2023)Noisy Retrieval of Experienced Probabilities Underlies Rational Judgment of Uncertain Multiple Events (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1994David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases24 cited
  • 1992Probabilities in the Courtroom: An Evaluation of the Objections and Policies20 cited
  • 1996Fallacy and controversy about base rates19 cited
  • 2004The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions19 cited
  • 1996The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses16 cited
  • 2018Can there be a burden of the best explanation?14 cited
  • 1996The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks13 cited
  • 1996Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation10 cited
  • 1996The base rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?8 cited
  • 1996Base rates, experience, and the big picture6 cited
  • 1996How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing5 cited
  • 1996Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus5 cited
  • 1996Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic4 cited
  • 1996First things first: What is a base rate?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

4 cited
  • 1996Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm?4 cited
  • 1996Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates3 cited