SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Wie schreibe ich eine Originalarbeit?
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Wie schreibe ich eine Originalarbeit? (2007)Wie schreibe ich eine Originalarbeit?How to Write an English Medical Manuscript That Will Be Published and Have Impact (2006)How to Write an English Medic…How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking. (2006)How to read, understand, and …Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published (2005)Suggesting or Excluding Revie…How to Write a Research Paper (2004)How to Write a Research PaperAuthorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions (2004)Authorship Criteria and Discl…How I Review an Original Scientific Article (2002)How I Review an Original Scie…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Scientific dishonesty: European reflections (2001)Scientific dishonesty: Europe…Scientific dishonesty: European reflections (2001)Scientific dishonesty: Europe…Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Fe…Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Unpublished Research From a M…Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Uniform Requirements for Manu…The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)The vexed question of authors…Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. (1996)Coauthors' contributions to m…International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)International Committee of Me…How to Write and Publish Papers in the Medical Sciences. (1983)How to Write and Publish Pape…Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Author Perception of Peer Review (2002)The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality (2007)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews (2002)Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles (2006)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship (2016)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)How to Review a Manuscript: A "Down-to-Earth" Approach (2004)Mentoring (2004)How to review a manuscript (2010)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2012)Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines (2016)Utilizing the Literatures in Teaching the Research Paper (1987)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)Writing a research article: advice to beginners (2004)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1990International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.415 cited
  • 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals342 cited
  • 1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting262 cited
  • 1997The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty242 cited
  • 2004Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions199 cited
  • 1996Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.180 cited
  • 1998Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance141 cited
  • 2002How I Review an Original Scientific Article117 cited
  • 1983How to Write and Publish Papers in the Medical Sciences.90 cited
  • 2004How to Write a Research Paper74 cited
  • 2005Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published39 cited
  • 2006How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking.30 cited
  • 2001Scientific dishonesty: European reflections22 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

How to Write an English Medical Manuscript That Will Be Published and Have Impact
19 cited
  • 2001Scientific dishonesty: European reflections19 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.