Article2015

Communicating product size using sound and shape symbolism

Stacey M. Baxter · Jasmina Ilicic · Alicia Kulczynski · Tina M. Lowrey

31 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Product & Brand Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification Marketing and Advertising Strategies Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate children’s perception of a product’s physical attribute (size) when presented with brand elements (brand name and brand logo) manipulated using sound and shape symbolism principles (brand name sounds and brand logo shape), across children of different developmental ages. Design/methodology/approach – The relationship between sounds and shapes was examined in a pilot study. A 2 × 2 experiment was then undertaken to examine the effect of brand name characteristics (front vowel sound versus back vowel sound) and brand logo design (angular versus curved) on children’s (from 5 to 12 years) product-related judgments. Findings – Older children use non-semantic brand stimuli as a means to infer physical product attributes. Specifically, only older children are able to perceive a product to be smaller (larger) when the product is paired with a brand name containing a front (back) vowel sound or an angular (curved) brand logo (single symbolic cue). We illustrate that brand logo-related shape symbolism effects are weaker and appear later in age when compared with brand name-related sound symbolism effects. Further, younger children are able to infer product attribute meaning when exposed to two symbolic cues (that is, brand name and brand logo). Practical implications – When selecting an inventive brand element, consideration should be given to the relationship between the vowel sounds contained in a brand’s name and product attributes, and also the shape of the brand’s logo and product attributes. Originality/value – This is the first experiment undertaken to examine the combination of brand name- and brand logo-related symbolism effects in the context of children. We demonstrate that age-based bounds may be overcome through the provision of multiple symbolic cues.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience 1999Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look At Twenty‐Five Years of Research 1983Stages of reading development 2001Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language 1929A study in phonetic symbolism.1998Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos 2006The shape of boubas: sound–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults 2010Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations

Cited by

2021Size sound symbolism in the English lexicon 2022Small sounds, big impact: sonic logos and their effect on consumer attitudes, emotions, brands and advertising placement 2017Logo Effects on Brand Extension Evaluations from the Electrophysiological Perspective 2014Examining the brand name – mark relationship in emerging markets 2019Consumer attitudes toward downward extensions: an exploration of Giordano’s extension in Hong Kong

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.