SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterMethodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms

Sibel Erduran2007

Chapter2007

Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms

158 citations·0/0 files stored·Science & technology education library

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Educational Research and Methods Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 158 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society 1987Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society 2003The Uses of Argument 2010Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics 1991The Skills of Argument 1989Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and the Activity of the Experimental Article in Science 1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science 2004TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse

Cited by

2018Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School 2011‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making 2011Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education 2012Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry 2012

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2008Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directionsarticle · 12 shared references 2007Cognitive Foundations of Learning Argumentationchapter · 11 shared references 2007Argumentation in Science Education: An Overviewchapter · 10 shared references 2014Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activityarticle · 10 shared references 2007Analysis of Lines of Reasoning in Written Argumentationchapter · 10 shared references 2008The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentationarticle · 9 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typechapter

Published2007-01-01

VenueScience & technology education library

ISSN-L1572-5987

Languageen

Citations158

Files0 public / 0

ShelfScience Education and Pedagogy

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_3

openalex_workW1564284620

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions

2011The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context

2015Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction

2012Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class