Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms

16 references·16 citing·28 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1988Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society10,767 cited
1987Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society8,955 cited
2003The Uses of Argument7,099 cited
2010Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics2,532 cited
1991The Skills of Argument2,094 cited
1989Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and the Activity of the Experimental Article in Science1,521 cited
1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science1,482 cited
2004TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse1,406 cited
2001Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics1,346 cited
2000?Doing the lesson? or ?doing science?: Argument in high school genetics1,023 cited
2013Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning992 cited
2013Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory807 cited
2005Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom764 cited
2004Explanation‐driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry718 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005

The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations

632 cited

1996Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels433 cited

Cited by

2018Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School153 cited
2011‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making152 cited
2011Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education137 cited
2012Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry131 cited
2012Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions125 cited
2011The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context105 cited
2015Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction104 cited
2012Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class100 cited
2011Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory—Exploring effects of task features93 cited
2016The nature of students' chemical reasoning employed in scientific argumentation in physical chemistry86 cited
2010Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework81 cited
2012EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT IN SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE73 cited
2012Argumentation in Science Education Research61 cited
2016Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to the special issue49 cited
2014Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies37 cited
2015Developing Argumentation Strategies in Electronic Dialogs: Is Modeling Effective?33 cited