SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Discriminação e consistência no processo decisório: mensuração do nível de conhecimento utilizando o índice CWS
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Discriminação e consistência no processo decisório: mensuração do nível de conhecimento utilizando o índice CWS (2008)Discriminação e consistência no processo …Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When Is It Worse to Know Better? (2014)Expertise and Intelligent Thi…People who judge people (2006)People who judge peopleIndividual differences in chess expertise: A psychometric investigation (2006)Individual differences in che…Domain experts influence decision quality: Towards a robust method for their identification (2006)Domain experts influence deci…An Investigation of the Attributes of Top Industry Audit Specialists (2004)An Investigation of the Attri…The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making (2003)The Impact of Experience and …Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not (2002)Performance-based assessment …Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (2001)Sources of Power: How People …Learning about and learning from expert teachers (2001)Learning about and learning f…The impact of data quality information on decision making: an exploratory analysis (1999)The impact of data quality in…Decision Making by Experts: The GNAHM Effect (1999)Decision Making by Experts: T…Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence (1998)Feature Centrality and Concep…Human Judgment and Social Policy (1996)Human Judgment and Social Pol…Validating Instruments in MIS Research1 (1989)Validating Instruments in MIS…Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. (1974)Expert judgment: Some necessa…The Comparison of Different Scales of Measurement for Experimental Results (1943)The Comparison of Different S…Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice (2000)Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology (2002)Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1 (2003)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Linear models in decision making. (1974)Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance (1984)Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography (1989)Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk (2000)Victims of Groupthink (1972)Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999)Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity (2007)Helpful Reviewers in TripAdvisor, an Online Travel Community (2011)Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (2013)A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol (2017)Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform (1987)Handbook of educational psychology (1997)Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers (2004)Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften (2006)Handbook of Educational Psychology (2013)Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model (2016)Philosophical Investigations. (1954)Basic objects in natural categories (1976)Features of similarity. (1977)Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products (2001)Explanation and Understanding (2005)Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building (2020)The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993)The Adaptive Decision Maker (1994)Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers (1996)Criticality of data quality as exemplified in two disasters (2001)Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement (2009)Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities (2018)Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. (1978)Effective Use of knowledge management Systems: A Process Model of Content Ratings and Credibility Indicators1 (2005)Supporting data quality management in decision-making (2005)Data quality assessment in context: A cognitive perspective (2009)The Crisis Approach (2017)Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence (2019)Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice (2020)Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. (2001)Mindful Judgment and Decision Making (2008)Thinking About Entrepreneurial Decision Making (2014)Investing in creativity. (1996)The cognitive neuroscience of creativity (2004)RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Validating Instruments in MIS Research12,549 cited
  • 2001Learning about and learning from expert teachers1,088 cited
  • 1996Human Judgment and Social Policy851 cited
  • 1998Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence392 cited
  • 1974Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example.342 cited
  • 2002Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not322 cited
  • 2014Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When Is It Worse to Know Better?271 cited
  • 2001Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions271 cited
  • 2003The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making222 cited
  • 1999The impact of data quality information on decision making: an exploratory analysis188 cited
  • 2006Individual differences in chess expertise: A psychometric investigation125 cited
  • 1999Decision Making by Experts: The GNAHM Effect61 cited
  • 2004An Investigation of the Attributes of Top Industry Audit Specialists53 cited
  • 1943The Comparison of Different Scales of Measurement for Experimental Results52 cited
  • 2006People who judge people44 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006
Domain experts influence decision quality: Towards a robust method for their identification
34 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.