No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper reviews the literature about theAstonProgramme of organizational research, in particular, its studies of organizational structure. The intellectual commitments of theAstonProgramme are explicated and contrasted with the then dominant traditions of organizational research. The methodology is explained, with its emphasis on quantitative variables, reliable scales and statistical methods. The way successive studies confirmed or challenged Weberian bureaucracy is discussed. The major structural scales and their short forms are described. The relationships among the structural variables and between them and the contextual variables of size, technology and public accountability are outlined. The generalizability of these relationships in organizational research across countries is considered. The paper offers a roughly chronological narrative in three phases: the originalAston study, theNational study and then on to the many subsequent replication and extension studies and reviews of them. Some cognate organizational research studies are brought in that confirm theAstonProgramme. The need to continue theAstonianCartesian approach rather than the configurational approach is emphasized. In closing, theAston legacy is briefly summated and a vision for a futureAstonProgramme is offered in anEpilogue.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.