SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State
0 references·16 citing·52 second hop
Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State (2012)Professional Discretion and Accountabilit…How does the usage of artificial intelligence affect felt administrative accountability of street-level bureaucrats? The mediating effect of perceived discretion (2024)How does the usage of artific…Working the Boundaries of Social Work: Artificial Intelligence and the Profession of Social Work (2023)Working the Boundaries of Soc…Discretionary Responses in Frontline Encounters: Balancing Standardization with the Ethics of Office (2022)Discretionary Responses in Fr…Accountable for What? The Effect of Accountability Standard Specification on Decision-Making Behavior in the Public Sector (2021)Accountable for What? The Eff…Child welfare and future assessments – An analysis of discretionary decision-making in newborn removals in Norway (2020)Child welfare and future asse…Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work: lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (2018)Measures of accountability an…Legal Regulation and Professional Discretion in Schools (2018)Legal Regulation and Professi…Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable (2017)Public deliberation and the f…The role of professional judgement in social work assessment: a comparison between Norway and England (2016)The role of professional judg…Organisational routines – the interplay of legal standards and professional discretion (2016)Organisational routines – the…Learning to reason: the factorial survey as a teaching tool in social work education (2016)Learning to reason: the facto…Child welfare workers’ experiences of obstacles in care order preparation: a cross-country comparison (2016)Child welfare workers’ experi…Bounded deliberation in public committees: the case of experts (2016)Bounded deliberation in publi…The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis (2015)The formalized framework for …Shifts in curriculum control: contesting ideas of teacher autonomy (2015)Shifts in curriculum control:…Discretion in the “Backyard of Law”: Case Handling of Debt Relief in Sweden (2013)Discretion in the “Backyard o…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Research Methods in Education (2007)Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2015)Teacher autonomy and teacher agency: a comparative study in Brazilian and Norwegian lower secondary education (2020)Teacher autonomy for improving teacher self-efficacy in multicultural classrooms: A cross-national study of professional development in multicultural education (2020)Assessing the assessment: exploring Norwegian primary education teachers’ perceptions of national accountability testing (2024)The Model of Rules (1967)The three worlds of welfare capitalism (1990)Between Facts and Norms (1996)The Population's Confidence in the Child Protection System – A Survey Study of England, Finland, Norway and the United States (California) (2016)Negotiating deficiency: Exploring ethnic minority parents' narratives about encountering child welfare services in Norway (2017)The ethnic identity of transracially placed foster children with an ethnic minority background: A systematic literature review (2021)Organizational Learning (1988)A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS? (1991)Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003)School leaders’ and teachers’ work with national test results: Lost in translation? (2017)Taking education to account? The limits of law in institutional and professional practice (2020)Studies in Ethnomethodology. (1968)The System of Professions (1988)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Professional judgement about re-offending: Factorial survey (2019)Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (2002)Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research (2004)Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges (2007)Epistemic democracy and the role of experts (2019)Dilemmas in a general theory of planning (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Comparing Risk-Averse and Risk-Friendly Practitioners in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study (2017)New public management and practitioner autonomy in children’s services in Norway and Wales: views from the frontline (2019)On (not) learning from self-neglect safeguarding adult reviews (2021)Democracy and Its Critics (1962)Democracy and its critics (1990)Governance by Hybrid Advisory Committees – A Hallmark of Social Democracy? (2021)Pursuing impact in research: towards an ethical approach (2022)Citizen Knowledge (2023)Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (1981)The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. (1990)From “what works” to “making it work”: A practice perspective on evidence‐based standardization in frontline service organizations (2021)The challenges of combining ‘knowing-that’ and ‘knowing-how’ in social work education and professional practice in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (2021)Development of hybrid professionalism: street-level managers’ work and the enabling conditions of public reform (2022)TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT (1997)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)A behavioral view on responsibility attribution in multi‐level governance: Upward and downward responsibility attribution in response to performance below aspirations (2022)Individual, organizational, and institutional accountability: a systematic literature review in public administration (2024)The Emotional Backlash of Public Accountability (2025)Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (2018)Artificial Intelligence in Social Work: An EPIC Model for Practice (2025)Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Case Management in Social Work Services: A Systematic Review (2025)The Effects of AI on Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Scoping Review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Shifts in curriculum control: contesting ideas of teacher autonomy99 cited
  • 2017Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable93 cited
  • 2015The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis61 cited
  • 2016Organisational routines – the interplay of legal standards and professional discretion32 cited
  • 2016Bounded deliberation in public committees: the case of experts31 cited
  • 2023Working the Boundaries of Social Work: Artificial Intelligence and the Profession of Social Work29 cited
  • 2018Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work: lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service29 cited
  • 2016Learning to reason: the factorial survey as a teaching tool in social work education28 cited
  • 2021Accountable for What? The Effect of Accountability Standard Specification on Decision-Making Behavior in the Public Sector28 cited
  • 2016The role of professional judgement in social work assessment: a comparison between Norway and England28 cited
  • 2018Legal Regulation and Professional Discretion in Schools28 cited
  • 2022Discretionary Responses in Frontline Encounters: Balancing Standardization with the Ethics of Office22 cited
  • 2013Discretion in the “Backyard of Law”: Case Handling of Debt Relief in Sweden

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2024How does the usage of artificial intelligence affect felt administrative accountability of street-level bureaucrats? The mediating effect of perceived discretion21 cited
  • 2020Child welfare and future assessments – An analysis of discretionary decision-making in newborn removals in Norway20 cited
  • 2016Child welfare workers’ experiences of obstacles in care order preparation: a cross-country comparison19 cited