SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Going Beyond the Grand Mean: Subgroup Analysis in Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Trials
7 references·2 citing·37 second hop
Going Beyond the Grand Mean: Subgroup Analysis in Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Trials (2001)Going Beyond the Grand Mean: Subgroup Ana…Exploring Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis (1999)Exploring Heterogeneity in Me…Incommunicable Knowledge? Interpreting and Applying the Results of Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses (1998)Incommunicable Knowledge? Int…Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1997)Investigating underlying risk…The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis (1996)The relation between treatmen…Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors) (1987)Why do we need systematic ove…Problems in the medical interpretation of overviews (1987)Problems in the medical inter…Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Res…Power of Statistical Tests for Subgroup Analysis in Meta-Analysis (2020)Power of Statistical Tests fo…Promise and pitfalls in the meta-analysis of genetic association studies: a response to Sen and Schinka (2005)Promise and pitfalls in the m…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling (2004)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement of hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis (2005)Prospective Associations between Depression and Obesity for Adolescent Males and Females- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies (2016)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Exploring heterogeneity in meta‐analyses: needs, resources and challenges (2008)Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)How to perform meta-analysis in R: a simple yet comprehensive guide (2023)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading (1995)Analysing the relationship between treatment effect and underlying risk in meta-analysis: comparison and development of approaches (2000)Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit? (2005)Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)Incommunicable Knowledge: Science, Technology and the Clinical Art in Britain 1850-1914 (1985)A Short History of Cardiology (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Treating Individuals 1 - External validity of randomised controlled trials: "To whom do the results of this trial apply?"' (2005)Epidemiology, epigenetics and the ‘Gloomy Prospect’: embracing randomness in population health research and practice (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)META-ANALYSIS (1988)A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses (2007)Formalizing Syntheses of Medical Knowledge: The Rise of Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews (2012)Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: A critique (1991)Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials (1995)A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
  • 1987Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors)409 cited
  • 1997Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis227 cited
  • 1996The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis172 cited
  • 1999Exploring Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis83 cited
  • 1998Incommunicable Knowledge? Interpreting and Applying the Results of Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses55 cited
  • 1987Problems in the medical interpretation of overviews42 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Promise and pitfalls in the meta-analysis of genetic association studies: a response to Sen and Schinka27 cited
  • 2020Power of Statistical Tests for Subgroup Analysis in Meta-Analysis16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work