Self-control at work: its relationship with contextual performance

Benjamin J. de Boer · Edwin A. J. van Hooft · Arnold B. Bakker

49 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Managerial Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Behavioral Health and Interventions Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Abstract

Purpose – Individuals differ in their levels of self-control. Trait self-control has been found to relate positively to desirable and negatively to undesirable behaviors in contexts like physical health, academic performance, and criminality. The purpose of this study is to examine the relevance of trait self-control in work-settings. The authors distinguished between two types of self-control, stop-control (inhibitory control) and start-control (initiatory control), and tested their differential validity in predicting contextual performance. Design/methodology/approach – In two independent employee samples, stop-control, start-control, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), personal initiative, and proactive coping were measured. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) was added in Study 2. Findings – Results showed that only start-control was positively related to OCB, personal initiative, and proactive coping. Both stop-control and start-control were negatively related to CWB. Research limitations/implications – Findings support the validity of distinguishing between stop-control and start-control, suggesting that self-control theory and models should be refined to incorporate this distinction. Limitations include the correlational design and self-report measures. Although results were similar across two independent studies, future research is needed to test the generalizability of the conclusions in other settings, using non-self-report data. Practical implications – The distinction between stop-control and start-control may help organizations in selecting staff and assigning tasks. Originality/value – The present research introduces the distinction between two conceptually different types of self-control (stop-control and start-control), demonstrating their relevance to work-related behavior.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 2007The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art 1976Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory 2004High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success 1999Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.1998On the Self-Regulation of Behavior 1983Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.2005Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications

Cited by

2021Effects of using the management control system on individual performance with the intervenience of feedforward and organizational learning 2021Stop and start control at work: Differential validity of two types of self‐control for work behavior and emotion regulation 2019Hubungan Kontrol Diri Dengan Pemujaan Terhadap Idola Pada Remaja Penggemar K-Pop 2025Evaluating employee performance in the Indian manufacturing sectors: identifying critical success factors 2024

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.