Critical management studies and “mainstream” organization science

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a rapprochement between the field of critical management studies (CMS) and what is constructed here as the “mainstream” of organization theory and research. Design/methodology/approach The paper contains a comparative analysis of relevant literature from the fields of organization theory, political science and political psychology. Findings It is found, first, that at least four instances of “mainstream” theory and research more or less share CMS assumptions; second, that CMS and “mainstream” may benefit from mutual contact (using the example of the “power elite” discussion in the 1950s and 1960s); third, that CMS and “mainstream” may benefit from “mainstream” operationalization of CMS‐concepts (using the example of the development of theF‐scale in the 1930s and 1940s). Originality/value The paper ranks among the first to search for convergences between two fields that seem firmly divided in both theoretical and institutional terms.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.