SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research through the use of reporting guidelines
11 references·3 citing·46 second hopsampled
The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research through the use of reporting guidelines (2008)The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the qualit…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors (2007)Endorsement of the STARD Stat…Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting (2006)Systematic reviews of diagnos…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2005)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors (2005)Endorsement of the CONSORT st…Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology (2004)Determining the reporting qua…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future (2003)Reporting of prognostic marke…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Perinatal pharmacoepidemiology: How often are key methodological elements reported in publications? (2021)Perinatal pharmacoepidemiolog…A guide to peer reviewing medical education scholarship: Advice from editors of AEM Education and Training (2021)A guide to peer reviewing med…Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Healthcare: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project (2008)Publication Guidelines for Qu…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Hodgkin Lymphoma in Biomedical Journals (2006)Analysis of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Governed by the CONSORT Statement (2009)Quality of Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials in Tai Chi Interventions—A Systematic Review (2009)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Bias in Surgical Research (2008)Survival End Point Reporting in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Review of Major Journals (2008)Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014 (2016)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests (2009)Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond (2012)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses (2012)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The CONSORT statement (2019)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond (2009)Ten steps towards improving prognosis research (2009)Evaluating the Quality of Research into a Single Prognostic Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 83 Studies of C-Reactive Protein in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (2010)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Individual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine (2010)Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial (2013)Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview (2017)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • 2005Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors178 cited
  • 2003Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future166 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies138 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting80 cited
  • 2004Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology56 cited
  • 2007Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors34 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Healthcare: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project12 cited
  • 2021Perinatal pharmacoepidemiology: How often are key methodological elements reported in publications?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited
  • 2021A guide to peer reviewing medical education scholarship: Advice from editors of AEM Education and Training9 cited