The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: the repatriates’ perspective

Anne Burmeister · Jürgen Deller · Joyce S. Osland · Betina Agata Szkudlarek · Gary R. Oddou · Roger N. Blakeney

47 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Knowledge Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Student and Expatriate Challenges Innovation and Knowledge Management Knowledge Management and Sharing

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to add a process perspective to the literature on repatriate knowledge transfer (RKT) and to understand how the knowledge transfer process unfolds in the repatriation context. Thus, this qualitative study uses existing knowledge transfer process models to assess their applicability to the context of repatriation and explain the micro-processes during RKT. Design/methodology/approach – To provide a rich understanding of these processes from the repatriate perspective, critical incidents reported by 29 German and US American repatriates were content-analyzed. Findings – The findings are summarized in a proposed RKT process model, which describes the roles and knowledge transfer-related activities of repatriates, recipients and supervisors as well as their interaction during four transfer phases: assessment, initiation, execution and evaluation. Research limitations/implications – The experiences of repatriates from different geographic areas as well as the perspectives of knowledge recipients and supervisors were not studied but should be included in future research. In addition, future research could test the applicability of the identified micro-processes to different knowledge transfer contexts. Practical implications – Managers can use the findings to facilitate the RKT process more effectively because the type of organizational support offered can be aligned with the changing needs of repatriates, recipients and supervisors during the four identified phases. Originality/value – This is the first study that takes a process perspective to understand RKT. The integration of the current findings with the existing literature can enable a more nuanced view on RKT.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage 2004Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage 1980Qualitative research and evaluation methods 1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1984Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.1995The Knowledge-Creating Company 1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 2008Qualitative Data Analysis

Cited by

2017Repatriation of international assignees 2016Repatriates and reverse knowledge transfer in MNCs 2020The influence of empowering leadership on repatriate knowledge transfer: understanding mechanisms and boundary conditions 2021Managing global knowledge transfer: Inpatriate manager embeddedness and firm innovation 2020How do knowledge governance mechanisms impact on repatriate knowledge transfer intention? The moderating role of perceived career and repatriation support and person-organization fit 2023

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.