Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials

16 references·10 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
2012Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.668 cited
2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.489 cited
2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

473 cited

2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited

2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited

2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research380 cited

Cited by

2017Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–201343 cited
2023The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis35 cited
2021Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study*34 cited
2019Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review25 cited
2025Empirical evidence of observer bias in randomized clinical trials: updated and expanded analysis of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors22 cited
2022Empirical evidence of study design biases in nutrition randomised controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study17 cited
2016Meta‐epidemiological study: a step‐by‐step approach by using R16 cited
2021Clinical trials in COVID-19 management & prevention: A meta-epidemiological study examining methodological quality15 cited
2024Blinding Assessments in Neonatal Ventilation Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Meta-Epidemiological Review14 cited
2024Quality of reporting inflammatory bowel disease randomised controlled trials: a systematic review13 cited