SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality and integrity in scientific writing: prerequisites for quality in science communication
10 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Quality and integrity in scientific writing: prerequisites for quality in science communication (2009)Quality and integrity in scientific writi…The European Commission (2015)The European CommissionPublish and perish (2007)Publish and perishAnatomy of an R&R (Or, Reviewers are an Author's Best Friends…) (2006)Anatomy of an R&R (Or, Review…Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (2004)Uniform Requirements for Manu…The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science (2004)The Chicago Guide to Communic…The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science (2002)The Chicago Guide to Communic…Masking, Blinding, and Peer Review: The Blind Leading the Blinded (1998)Masking, Blinding, and Peer R…How to Write & Publish A Scientific Paper. (1993)How to Write & Publish A Scie…Technical writer's handbook (1983)Technical writer's handbookAmerican National standard for writing abstracts (1977)American National standard fo…Decoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis (2024)Decoding the writing styles o…Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals (2012)Addressing editor(ial) malpra…The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Hedging in Scientific Research Articles (1998)Politics of Nature (2004)A Review of Individual and Institutional Publication Productivity in Medical Radiation Science (2015)A discourse analysis of the macro-structure, metadiscoursal and microdiscoursal features in the abstracts of research articles across multiple science disciplines (2018)Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Improving peer review: who's responsible? (2004)The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor (2006)Manuscript Rejection (2014)Writing for Scholarly Publication (1999)Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction (2004)TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL: A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT, PERFORMANCE, AND SATISFACTION. (2004)Observations on “Anatomy of an R&R” and Other Reflections (2006)Motivos de rejeição dos artigos nos periódicos de administração (2016)100 research rules of the game (2019)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal (2005)Use of the h index in neurosurgery (2009)Researchers' Perspectives on Collective/Community Co-Authorship in Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research (2010)Grounding in communication. (1991)Perspectives on socially shared cognition. (1991)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Diachronic changes in lexical density of research article abstracts: A corpus-based study (2024)How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications (2024)The accuracy-bias trade-offs in AI text detection tools and their impact on fairness in scholarly publication (2025)Desafios na publicação científica (2003)How to Write a Good Paper in Computer Science and HowWill It Be Measured by ISI Web of Knowledge (2010)The influence of formality and channel on relative pronoun choice in New Zealand English (1997)Exploring game design for cybersecurity training (2012)Changing the Learning Environment in the College of Engineering and Applied Science Using Challenge Based Learning (2015)Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research (2014)Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy (2006)How can we boost the impact of publications? Try better writing (2019)Examining the persistence of bounded spaces: remarks on regions, territories, and the practices of bordering (2022)UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage (2003)Assessing health system performance in developing countries: A review of the literature (2007)Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1983Technical writer's handbook2,703 cited
  • 2015The European Commission1,308 cited
  • 2004Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication142 cited
  • 2002The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science71 cited
  • 1998Masking, Blinding, and Peer Review: The Blind Leading the Blinded58 cited
  • 2004The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science51 cited
  • 1993How to Write & Publish A Scientific Paper.44 cited
  • 2007Publish and perish33 cited
  • 2006Anatomy of an R&R (Or, Reviewers are an Author's Best Friends…)28 cited
  • 1977American National standard for writing abstracts19 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Decoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis25 cited
  • 2012Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work