No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The paper begins by discussing the normative\nprinciples of the two main theoretical currents in public\nadministration in our days: NewPublicManagement and\nNeoWeberianism. Both orientations are very influential,\nnot only froma theoretical point of view, but also as blueprints\nfor administrative reforms. The paper focuses on\nthe differences between the two currents regarding normative\nprinciples: rational self-interest, in the case of\nNew Public Management, and civic duty or altruism, in\nthe case of NeoWeberianism. The paper discusses such\nnormative principles or normativemotivationswith some\nreferences to the history of political thought, particularly\nto Hegel�s criticism of Kant regarding the concept of the\nstate and its relationships to the market. In a final section,\nthe paper develops some proposals for institutional\ndesigns that could promote desinterested (altruistic)motivations\namong civil servants. The institutional designs\nmaterialize thus the idea of a positive ethics for public\nadministration.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.