Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research

Richard Bolden

1,227 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Management Reviews

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Leadership and Management in Organizations Team Dynamics and Performance Educational Leadership and Practices

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review conceptual and empirical literature on the concept of distributed leadership (DL) in order to identify its origins, key arguments and areas for further work. Consideration is given to the similarities and differences between DL and related concepts, including ‘shared’, ‘collective’, ‘collaborative’, ‘emergent’, ‘co‐’ and ‘democratic’ leadership. Findings indicate that, while there are some common theoretical bases, the relative usage of these concepts varies over time, between countries and between sectors. In particular, DL is a notion that has seen a rapid growth in interest since the year 2000, but research remains largely restricted to the field of school education and of proportionally more interest to UK than US‐based academics. Several scholars are increasingly going to great lengths to indicate that, in order to be ‘distributed’, leadership need not necessarily be widely ‘shared’ or ‘democratic’ and, in order to be effective, there is a need to balance different ‘hybrid configurations’ of practice. The paper highlights a number of areas for further attention, including three factors relating to the context of much work on DL (power and influence; organizational boundaries and context; and ethics and diversity), and three methodological and developmental challenges (ontology; research methods; and leadership development, reward and recognition). It is concluded that descriptive and normative perspectives which dominate the literature should be supplemented by more critical accounts which recognize the rhetorical and discursive significance of DL in (re)constructing leader–follower identities, mobilizing collective engagement and challenging or reinforcing traditional forms of organization.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,227 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes 1994Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.1991Situated Learning 1987Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations 1979The Social Psychology of Organizations.1988Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society 1969The social psychology of organizing 1981Leadership in Organizations

Cited by

2012Leadership in the Plural 2020The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems 2014A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations 2018Co-Production and Co-Creation 2015Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory 2018Shared leadership: A state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.