A Research Agenda for Six Sigma Research

Weiyong Zhang · Arthur V. Hill · Glenn H. Gilbreath

21 citations0/0 files storedQuality Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Quality and Supply Management Management and Optimization Techniques Management Systems and Quality Improvement

Abstract

Since its inception, Six Sigma has been adopted by many organizations in a wide variety of industries, and has continued to deliver positive results after years of experience. Rich anecdotal evidence supports the effectiveness of Six Sigma in improving quality, productivity, cost, customer satisfaction, sales, and profitability. Six Sigma has also been found to be effective in translating strategic goals into actionable projects and in developing leaders.These positive reports suggest that Six Sigma deserves serious research attention. To date, however, few research articles have addressed Six Sigma. To close this research gap, the authors first conducted a nearly exhaustive search of the Six Sigma academic and practitioner literature. They then conducted numerous focus group meetings with expert practitioners, interacted with senior managers in executive seminars, and networked with leading researchers. They also gained first-hand experience through involvement in many Six Sigma programs.From the authors' critical analysis of the Six Sigma literature, they make four important observations. First, it is nearly impossible to develop a formal conceptual definition of Six Sigma. Second, they identify five views of Six Sigma and argue for the program view. Third, they identify five core elements that are a part of nearly all Six Sigma programs. Fourth, from this program view and set of core elements, the authors identify eight important program view research questions and lay the research foundation for each of these questions. Based on these observations, they challenge the academic and practitioner communities to work collaboratively to find practical research-based answers to each of their eight questions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1986Research in Organizational Behavior.1997The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action 1995Institutions and organizations 1988Organizational Learning 1988Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems 1996Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change 2003Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited

Cited by

2015Project barriers to Green Belts through critical success factors

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.