Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Development and Impact of High Stakes Testing.

1 references·16 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2013A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem642 cited

Cited by

2006Accelerating Mathematics Achievement Using Heterogeneous Grouping179 cited
2006The Context of Minority Disproportionality: Practitioner Perspectives on Special Education Referral161 cited
2008Accountability, Rigor, and Detracking: Achievement Effects of Embracing a Challenging Curriculum as a Universal Good for All Students124 cited
2004Accountability in a Postdesegregation Era: The Continuing Significance of Racial Segregation in Florida’s Schools122 cited
2001An Uncertain Lever: Exploring the Influence of State-Level Testing in New York State on Teaching Social Studies118 cited
2000Teachers and Tests: Exploring Teachers' Perceptions of Changes in the New York State Testing Program60 cited
2005Impact of a High School Graduation Examination on Social Studies Teachers’ Instructional Practices55 cited
2004Appropriate and Inappropriate Forms of Testing, Assessment, and Accountability49 cited
2006Student Reactions to Being Wrongly Informed of Failing a High-Stakes Test30 cited
2008Issues in culturally appropriate psychoeducational assessment.28 cited
2008Unraveling the Myths of Accountability: A Case Study of the California High School Exit Exam16 cited
2009High Stakes Testing and Teaching to the Test12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006

Beyond Standardization in School Accountability

8 cited

2002Oppression, conflict, and collusion: high-stakes accountability from the perspective of three social justice principals7 cited

2018Rural Elementary Administrators’ Views of High-Stakes Testing6 cited

2003Teachers' perception of use of student performance information: Technology acceptance model6 cited