Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the U nited S tates and E urope in terms of highly cited papers and N obel P rizes

16 references·10 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data8,008 cited
2018Power-law distributions in empirical data6,499 cited
1998How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution1,501 cited
2004The scientific impact of nations1,244 cited
2006The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’506 cited
2006On the origins of bibliometrics289 cited
2010Metrics: A profusion of measures267 cited
1992Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making188 cited
2011The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates156 cited
2010Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact132 cited
2010Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning121 cited
2012How good is research really?92 cited
1996UsingCitation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery72 cited
2009The h‐index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus69 cited
2010A comparison of the scientific performance of the U.S. and the European union at the turn of the 21st century

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

66 cited

2011A Simple Index for the High-Citation Tail of Citation Distribution to Quantify Research Performance in Countries and Institutions60 cited

Cited by

2017Double rank analysis for research assessment20 cited
2020The inconsistency of h-index: A mathematical analysis20 cited
2018Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data20 cited
2018Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis17 cited
2020Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States15 cited
2023A leading bibliometric author does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis15 cited
2018Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis15 cited
2018Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future15 cited
2018The hierarchical status of international academic awards in social sciences15 cited
2019Probability and expected frequency of breakthroughs: basis and use of a robust method of research assessment14 cited