SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style?
16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled
Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? (2003)Abstracts, introductions and discussions:…Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication (2016)Genre Knowledge in Disciplina…Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology (2003)Improving the Clarity of Jour…The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications, pp. 1-25 (2001)The Challenge of Scientometri…Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach (2000)Student writing and staff fee…English in Today's Research World: A Writing Guide (2000)English in Today's Research W…English in Today's Research World (2000)English in Today's Research W…Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. (1999)Linguistic styles: Language u…How We Write: Writing as Creative Design (1998)How We Write: Writing as Crea…Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Effects of Peer Review and Ed…Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre Analysis: English in Ac…How to write and publish a scientific paper (1990)How to write and publish a sc…Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387. (1989)Introduction to functional gr…Variation across Speech and Writing (1988)Variation across Speech and W…A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations (1988)A genre-based investigation o…The Writing of Research Article Introductions (1987)The Writing of Research Artic…Designing instructional text (1978)Designing instructional textThe relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses (2022)The relationship between read…Can it be measured? A quantitative assessment of critiques of the entrepreneurship literature (2022)Can it be measured? A quantit…Adjectives and adverbs in life sciences across 50 years: implications for emotions and readability in academic texts (2022)Adjectives and adverbs in lif…Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years (2021)Linguistic positivity bias in…An approach for detecting the commonality and specialty between scientific publications and patents (2021)An approach for detecting the…Write better, publish better (2020)Write better, publish betterLarge-scale language analysis of peer review reports (2020)Large-scale language analysis…Examining the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown in Wuhan and Lombardy: A Psycholinguistic Analysis on Weibo and Twitter (2020)Examining the Impact of COVID…Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal (2018)Informetrics of Scientometric…Easy to read, easy to cite? (2018)Easy to read, easy to cite?Readability and citations in information science: evidence from abstracts and articles of four journals (2003–2012) (2016)Readability and citations in …The readability of articles in tourism journals (2015)The readability of articles i…Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011)Closed versus open reviewing …There's More to the Title Than Meets the Eye: Exploring the Possibilities (2007)There's More to the Title Tha…The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts (2007)The effects of spacing and ti…Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals (2003)Using New Technology to Asses…Modern factor analysis (1960)Conceiving the self (1979)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (2012)Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach (2013)The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 (2015)Categories of the Theory of Grammar (1961)Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse (1980)Syntax (1984)Talking science: language, learning, and values (1991)Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method (2002)Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (2003)A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles (1994)A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences (2002)Aspects of article introductions (2011)Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes (2014)WARNING! Sign and Label Effectiveness (1996)Towards a Theory of Self‐Administered Questionnaire Design (1997)Principles and Heuristics for Designing Minimalist Instruction (1998)Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook (2008)Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts (2008)Re-thinking grammar: the impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding (2011)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse (2005)Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions (2006)Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles (2001)Authority and invisibility (2002)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves (2002)A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification (2010)Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses (2005)The quality of guidance and feedback to students (2007)From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education (2010)EAP: issues and directions (2002)Global Education Review (2002)Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy (2005)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1989Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387.9,880 cited
  • 1988Variation across Speech and Writing5,226 cited
  • 1992Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings4,694 cited
  • 1999Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference.1,960 cited
  • 1990How to write and publish a scientific paper569 cited
  • 2016Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication481 cited
  • 1988A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations451 cited
  • 1998How We Write: Writing as Creative Design306 cited
  • 2000Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach264 cited
  • 1978Designing instructional text240 cited
  • 2000English in Today's Research World234 cited
  • 1987The Writing of Research Article Introductions224 cited
  • 2000English in Today's Research World: A Writing Guide212 cited
  • 2001The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications, pp. 1-25132 cited
  • 1994Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

95 cited
  • 2003Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology79 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Examining the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown in Wuhan and Lombardy: A Psycholinguistic Analysis on Weibo and Twitter122 cited
    • 2021Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years63 cited
    • 2015The readability of articles in tourism journals61 cited
    • 2016Readability and citations in information science: evidence from abstracts and articles of four journals (2003–2012)60 cited
    • 2022The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses52 cited
    • 2011Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?49 cited
    • 2007There's More to the Title Than Meets the Eye: Exploring the Possibilities38 cited
    • 2020Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports35 cited
    • 2007The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts33 cited
    • 2022Can it be measured? A quantitative assessment of critiques of the entrepreneurship literature30 cited
    • 2021An approach for detecting the commonality and specialty between scientific publications and patents27 cited
    • 2018Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal24 cited
    • 2018Easy to read, easy to cite?23 cited
    • 2022Adjectives and adverbs in life sciences across 50 years: implications for emotions and readability in academic texts22 cited
    • 2003Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals19 cited
    • 2020Write better, publish better16 cited