Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

There is Data, and then there is Data: Only Experimental Evidence will Determine the Utility of Differential Weighting of Expert Judgment

13 references·2 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory733 cited
2014Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy705 cited
2011The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue411 cited
2007TU Delft expert judgment data base319 cited
1975Delphi critique : expert opinion, forecasting, and group process237 cited
2007A study of expert overconfidence203 cited
1994Assessing the quality of expert judgment168 cited
2000Procedures Guide for Structural Expert Judgement in Accident Consequence Modelling150 cited
1991Group Decision Fiascoes Continue: Space Shuttle Challenger and a Revised Groupthink Framework130 cited
2008Comment on Cooke's classical method98 cited
1970Confidence in the prediction and postdiction of an uncertain outcome.97 cited
1990Prediction and postdiction preferences in guessing94 cited
2013The effect of the number of seed variables on the performance of Cooke′s classical model59 cited

Cited by

2016An investigation of dependence in expert judgement studies with multiple experts48 cited
2016Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts’ Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

34 cited