SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleInstructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.

Shari Seidman Diamond1993

Article1993

Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.

Shari Seidman Diamond

67 citations·0/0 files stored·American Psychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 67 citations exist upstream.

References

1983Inside the jury 1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions 1985The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure 1990Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias.1986Judging the jury 1991Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts.1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?1973Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral Dilemma

Cited by

2005The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death?2002The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.2002Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor1 1997Racial Attitudes and the Death Penalty1 1997A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions.

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

1997What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process.article · 10 shared references 2000Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidentsother · 10 shared references 2001Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.article · 8 shared references 2016“It will be your duty…:” The Psychology of Criminal Jury Instructionschapter · 8 shared references 1992Jury Decision Makingchapter · 8 shared references 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.article · 7 shared references

Details

Year1993

Typearticle

Published1993-01-01

VenueAmerican Psychologist

ISSN-L0003-066X

Languageen

Citations67

Files0 public / 0

ShelfJury Decision Making Processes

Identifiers

doi10.1037//0003-066x.48.4.423

openalex_workW1963485953

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2000

Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections.

2005REAL JURIES

2004Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge.