SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects.
8 references·15 citing·42 second hop
Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. (1997)Social influence in eyewitness recall: A …Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Meta-Analytic Procedures for …Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. (1988)Convicted but innocent: Wrong…Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. (1985)Improving eyewitness identifi…Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. (1981)Eyewitness identification: Li…Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority (1965)Some Conditions of Obedience …EFFECTS OF GROUP PRESSURE UPON THE MODIFICATION AND DISTORTION OF JUDGMENTS (1961)EFFECTS OF GROUP PRESSURE UPO…A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. (1955)A study of normative and info…Groups, Leadership, and Men (1952)Groups, Leadership, and MenImproving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test (2020)Improving juror sensitivity t…Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification (2017)Improving the effectiveness o…HendersonInstructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation? (2017)HendersonInstructions: Do The…Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? (2017)Comparing the effectiveness o…Eyewitness identification: Bayesian information gain, base-rate effect equivalency curves, and reasonable suspicion. (2015)Eyewitness identification: Ba…Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. (2014)Double-blind photo lineups us…Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform (2012)Costs and Benefits of Eyewitn…Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. (2008)Instruction bias and lineup p…Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory. (2006)Sequential vs. Simultaneous L…A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. (2005)A re-examination of the effec…Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments. (2004)Impact of defense-only and op…Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. (2003)Eyewitness accuracy rates in …Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation. (2001)Selecting lineup foils in eye…Individual Differences (2000)Individual DifferencesElimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. (1999)Elimination lineups: An impro…The CES-D Scale (1977)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking? (2004)The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. (2006)Can psychopathic offenders discern moral wrongs? A new look at the moral/conventional distinction. (2011)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. (1979)Mathematical Psychology (1991)The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups. (1993)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. (2001)Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. (1998)Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: Psychopathy and the purposes of punishment (2004)Regularities in eyewitness identification. (2007)Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. (2015)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Showups versus lineups: An evaluation using ROC analysis. (2012)Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Procedures Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis (2014)Theory of games and economic behavior (2019)Personality and the Behavior Disorders (1945)The Psychology of Aggression (1961)Behavioral Study of obedience. (1963)Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. (1995)Gender and Social Influence (2001)Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? (2009)The Psychology of Literacy (1981)Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. (2001)Auditor Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: An Explanatory Model Using Auditors' Personal Characteristics (2003)Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion. (2011)The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion (1974)Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda (2009)Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2014)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. (2003)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)The Bases of Social Power (1986)A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior (1991)Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity (2004)Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. (1977)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1955A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.4,815 cited
  • 1994Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.4,249 cited
  • 1961EFFECTS OF GROUP PRESSURE UPON THE MODIFICATION AND DISTORTION OF JUDGMENTS2,637 cited
  • 1952Groups, Leadership, and Men1,440 cited
  • 1965Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority1,141 cited
  • 1985Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.596 cited
  • 1981Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.364 cited
  • 1988Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system.139 cited

Cited by

  • 2000Individual Differences242 cited
  • 2012Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform187 cited
  • 2003Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.169 cited
  • 2008Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.118 cited
  • 2006Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory.111 cited
  • 1999Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses.111 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2005A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.108 cited
  • 2014Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.101 cited
  • 2015Eyewitness identification: Bayesian information gain, base-rate effect equivalency curves, and reasonable suspicion.83 cited
  • 2001Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation.81 cited
  • 2004Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.57 cited
  • 2017Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?35 cited
  • 2017HendersonInstructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation?27 cited
  • 2017Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification19 cited
  • 2020Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test14 cited