Evaluation of Three Short-Form Versions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

William D. Murry · Steven E. Markham

19 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Three short forms of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Briggs & Myers, 1976) were evaluated: (a) Form AV, (b) a 32-item form developed using the Form F scoring system, and (c) a 52-item form developed using item-response theory. Test information functions indicated that the short forms provided appreciably less information, especially in the critical area around the type cutoff score; discriminant analyses revealed unacceptably high (20%-36%) rates of type disagreement between short and long forms. Alternative strategies for reducing MBTI testing time are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1999Advances in Clinical Personality Measurement: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales 2001Time for the Changing of the Guard: A Farewell to Short Forms of Intelligence Tests 2012Retracted: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Sales Force Automation Usage: A Preliminary Study 2012Retracted: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Sales Force Automation Usage: A Review of Methodology

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.