SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Feasible is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Simulations of School AYP "Uniform Averaging" and "Safe Harbor" under the No Child Left Behind Act
5 references·6 citing·48 second hop
How Feasible is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Simulations of School AYP "Uniform Averaging" and "Safe Harbor" under the No Child Left Behind Act (2004)How Feasible is Adequate Yearly Progress …Large Mandates and Limited Resources: State Response to the No Child Left Behind Act and Implications for Accountability (2004)Large Mandates and Limited Re…Statewide Educational Accountability under NCLB. Central Issues Arising from An Examination of State Accountability Workbooks and U.S. Department of Education Reviews under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2003)Statewide Educational Account…Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations (2003)Accountability: Responsibilit…Stability of School-Building Accountability Scores and Gains (2002)Stability of School-Building …Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2002)Accountability Systems: Impli…Achievement gaps for students with disabilities: Stable, widening, or narrowing on a state-wide reading comprehension test? (2016)Achievement gaps for students…When is 100% not 100%? The Use of Safe Harbor to Make Adequate Yearly Progress (2013)When is 100% not 100%? The Us…Placism in NCLB—How Rural Children are Left Behind (2005)Placism in NCLB—How Rural Chi…Can Irrational Become Unconstitutional? NCLB's 100% Presuppositions (2005)Can Irrational Become Unconst…No Child Left Behind: An Illogical Accountability Model (2004)No Child Left Behind: An Illo…Listening to Teachers: Classroom Realities and No Child Left Behind. (2004)Listening to Teachers: Classr…How we should measure "change": Or should we? (1970)DEMONSTRATING THE RELIABILITY THE DIFFERENCE SCORE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CHANGE (1983)Formative Assessment Using Cbm-R Cut Scores To Track Progress Toward Success On State-Mandated Achievement Tests: a Comparison of Methods (2005)School Leadership and Student Achievement: The Mediating Effects of Teacher Beliefs (2006)No child, no school, no state left behind: schooling in the age of accountability 1 (2008)Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2017)Costs and Benefits (2003)New Patterns of Hispanic Settlement in Rural America (2004)No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2010)Successful leadership in a rural, high-poverty school: the case of County Line Middle School (2014)Leveraging the Perspectives of Rural Educators to Develop Realistic Job Previews for Rural Teacher Recruitment and Retention (2020)EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (1968)The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance (1989)Education Rights and Classroom-Based Litigation: Shifting the Boundaries of Evidence (2010)Misuse of High-Stakes Test Scores for Evaluative Purposes: Neglecting the Reality of Schools and Students (2012)Is the Common Core racing America to the top? Tracking changes in state standards, school practices, and student achievement (2017)Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence (2000)Instructional Program Coherence: What It Is and Why It Should Guide School Improvement Policy (2001)Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review (2003)Toward a More Effective Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (2006)Teachers' Views on No Child Left Behind: Support for the Principles, Concerns about the Practices (2010)Guided Play: A Solution to the Play Versus Learning Dichotomy (2016)An American Dilemma (1962)9. Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis (2002)Racial and Ethnic Achievement Gap Trends: Reversing the Progress Toward Equity? (2002)Validity of High‐Stakes Assessment: Are Students Engaged in Complex Thinking? (2004)The No Child Left Behind Act (2008)Assessments and Accountability (2000)The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture (2000)Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement (2008)Linking Leadership to Student Learning: The Contributions of Leader Efficacy (2008)How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey (2010)High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning (2002)Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools (2006)The Changing Roles of Teachers in an Era of High-Stakes Accountability (2007)Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011)High-Stakes Testing & Student Learning (2002)Reconsidering the Impact of High-stakes Testing (2004)Lead Articles: No Child Left Behind (2007)Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability (1986)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (2000)Improving Professional Development to Enhance Reading Outcomes for Students in Special Education (2016)The Effects of One versus Two Years of Intensive Reading Intervention Implemented with Late Elementary Struggling Readers (2017)Does co-teaching improve academic achievement for students with disabilities? A meta-analysis (2021)Preparing Teachers for the Age of Accountability: Toward a Framework for Assessment Education (2012)The Narrative Language Measures: Tools for Language Screening, Progress Monitoring, and Intervention Planning (2012)What About Writing? A National Exploratory Study of Writing Instruction in Teacher Preparation Programs (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001426 cited
  • 2003Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations300 cited
  • 2002Stability of School-Building Accountability Scores and Gains115 cited
  • 2003Statewide Educational Accountability under NCLB. Central Issues Arising from An Examination of State Accountability Workbooks and U.S. Department of Education Reviews under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.66 cited
  • 2004Large Mandates and Limited Resources: State Response to the No Child Left Behind Act and Implications for Accountability34 cited

Cited by

  • 2004Listening to Teachers: Classroom Realities and No Child Left Behind.82 cited
  • 2005Placism in NCLB—How Rural Children are Left Behind72 cited
  • 2016Achievement gaps for students with disabilities: Stable, widening, or narrowing on a state-wide reading comprehension test?54 cited
  • 2005Can Irrational Become Unconstitutional? NCLB's 100% Presuppositions20 cited
  • 2004No Child Left Behind: An Illogical Accountability Model19 cited
  • 2013When is 100% not 100%? The Use of Safe Harbor to Make Adequate Yearly Progress7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work