Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Most Biomedical Findings Echoed by Newspapers Turn Out to be False: The Case of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

10 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
2009Science communication reconsidered478 cited
1991Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific Community395 cited
2004Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers286 cited
2011Comparison of Effect Sizes Associated With Biomarkers Reported in Highly Cited Individual Articles and in Subsequent Meta-analyses252 cited
2012Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: retrospective cohort study136 cited
2009Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic?108 cited

Cited by

2017Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers76 cited
2016Constructing (un-)certainty: An exploration of journalistic decision-making in the reporting of neuroscience45 cited
2014Media Reporting of Neuroscience Depends on Timing, Topic and Newspaper Type39 cited
2013Does television reflect the evolution of scientific knowledge? The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder coverage on French television

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited

2020Messaging in Biological Psychiatry: Misrepresentations, Their Causes, and Potential Consequences30 cited

2022A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomized trials was common29 cited

2018Scientific Uncertainty in the Press: How Newspapers Describe Initial Biomedical Findings28 cited

2016Replication Validity of Initial Association Studies: A Comparison between Psychiatry, Neurology and Four Somatic Diseases28 cited

2020Cancer in the news: Bias and quality in media reporting of cancer research22 cited

2021Microbiome research in general and business newspapers: How many microbiome articles are published and which study designs make the news the most?21 cited

2020The Digital Phenotyping Project: A Psychoanalytical and Network Theory Perspective20 cited

2019Retos y perspectivas en el ecosistema de la información biomédica10 cited

2019What Are the Implications of Alternative Alpha Thresholds for Hypothesis Testing in Orthopaedics?10 cited

2018WissenschaftlerInnen als Kommunikatoren9 cited

2013Bias Neglect: A Blind Spot in the Evaluation of Scientific Results8 cited

2014Re-imagining psychology0 cited