Assessing early grade reading: the value and limits of ‘words per minute’

Barbara Elaine Graham · Agatha J. van Ginkel

54 citations0/0 files storedLanguage Culture and Curriculum

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Early Childhood Education and Development Literacy and Educational Practices

Abstract

Primary school enrolment in low-income countries has increased in recent years. The quality of education is, however, still a cause for concern. Better measurement of early reading progress has been suggested as a means of improving education quality. Benchmarks based on the number of ‘words per minute’ (WPM) students are able to read correctly have been proposed as a basis for assessment and comparison, even where languages and orthographies differ. This paper explores the extent to which WPM benchmarks, based mainly on research with native English speakers, are appropriate for cross-language comparisons. A quantitative study of early grade reading in two European (English and Dutch) and two African languages (Sabaot and Pokomo) analysed WPM and comprehension scores of over 300 children in three countries. Results indicate that similar comprehension scores were associated with diverse WPM rates. This suggests that WPM is not a reliable comparative measure of reading development since linguistic and orthographic features can differ considerably and are likely to influence the reading acquisition process. We argue that a good understanding of the languages of literacy (L1 and/or other) and their effects on reading acquisition are essential to the quest for quality education.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

References

1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1994The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1974Working Memory 1991Beginning to read : Thinking and learning about print. By Marilyn Jager Adams. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990. Pp. x, 494. Cloth $29.95.1974Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading 1987Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading 2003Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies 1990Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print

Cited by

2019The Need for Speed: Interrogating the Dominance of Oral Reading Fluency in International Reading Efforts 2021A distributed perspective on reading: implications for education 2016Writing morphophonology, reading lexical tone: Linguistic and experimental evidence in favour of morphographic spelling in Kabiye (Togo)2021Benchmarking oral reading fluency in the early grades in Nguni languages 2020Designing for Complexity in Mother Tongue or First Language (L1)-Based Multilingual Education Programs.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.