SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Submission Fees and Response Times in Academic Publishing
14 references·8 citing·40 second hop
Submission Fees and Response Times in Academic Publishing (2013)Submission Fees and Response Times in Aca…American Economic Review (2019)American Economic ReviewThe Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind v…IS PEER REVIEW IN DECLINE? (2010)IS PEER REVIEW IN DECLINE?Where Should We Submit Our Manuscript? An Analysis of Journal Submission Strategies (2009)Where Should We Submit Our Ma…THE SLOWDOWN IN FIRST‐RESPONSE TIMES OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: CAN IT BE BENEFICIAL? (2007)THE SLOWDOWN IN FIRST‐RESPONS…The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient? (2006)The Academic Review Process: …The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast? (2005)The Review Process in Economi…Open Access and Academic Journal Quality (2005)Open Access and Academic Jour…Are Delays in Academic Publishing Necessary? (2005)Are Delays in Academic Publis…Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory (2002)Evolving Standards for Academ…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The Slowdown of the Economics…Why referees are not paid (enough) (1998)Why referees are not paid (en…Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors (1994)Favoritism versus Search for …The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts (1980)The Optimal Order for Submitt…Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial (2025)Effect of Monetary Incentives…Modelling Scientific Communities (2023)Modelling Scientific Communit…Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018 (2020)Peer Review as an Evolving Re…On publication, refereeing and working hard (2018)On publication, refereeing an…ICIS 2017 Panel Report: Break Your Shackles! Emancipating Information Systems from the Tyranny of Peer Review (2018)ICIS 2017 Panel Report: Break…Competing for Attention: Lobbying Time‐Constrained Politicians (2016)Competing for Attention: Lobb…SUBMISSION DEMAND IN CORE ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A PANEL STUDY (2015)SUBMISSION DEMAND IN CORE ECO…A Model of the Academic Review Process with Informed Authors (2015)A Model of the Academic Revie…Moral Hazard in Teams (1982)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)Human Relations in the Workplace (1994)Making a difference (2007)Pro-social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services (2008)What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists (2015)The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism. (1972)Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange (1982)Where to submit? Journal choice by construction management authors (2008)The Economics of Superstars (2009)Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality (2012)16. Acceptable Points in General Cooperative n-Person Games (1959)Contributions to the theory of games. (1960)Free Labor for Costly Journals? (2001)The Pricing of Academic Journals: A Two-Sided Market Perspective (2010)Does Online Availability Increase Citations? Theory and Evidence from a Panel of Economics and Business Journals (2014)IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF OPEN ACCESS ON CITATIONS USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE JOURNALS (2014)Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship (1984)Intellectual Collaboration (2000)How Does the Market Use Citation Data? The Hirsch Index in Economics (2013)Productivity and mobility in academic research: evidence from mathematicians (2013)Home Bias, an Academic Puzzle (2016)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)Economics : an emerging small world? (2004)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s (2005)Monotone Comparative Statics (1994)Delegation and Nonmonetary Incentives (2015)Job Market Signaling (1973)The Economics of Science (2010)A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality (2011)Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market (1999)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Women in Academic Science (2014)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)The Superiority of Economists (2015)Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five (2020)Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers (1984)The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage (1998)The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019American Economic Review10,902 cited
  • 2000The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process514 cited
  • 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review425 cited
  • 1994Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors305 cited
  • 2002Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory252 cited
  • 2005Open Access and Academic Journal Quality122 cited
  • 2010IS PEER REVIEW IN DECLINE?77 cited
  • 1998Why referees are not paid (enough)69 cited
  • 2007THE SLOWDOWN IN FIRST‐RESPONSE TIMES OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: CAN IT BE BENEFICIAL?56 cited
  • 2005Are Delays in Academic Publishing Necessary?53 cited
  • 2005The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast?46 cited
  • 1980The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts44 cited
  • 2009Where Should We Submit Our Manuscript? An Analysis of Journal Submission Strategies43 cited
  • 2006The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?35 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Competing for Attention: Lobbying Time‐Constrained Politicians29 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2025Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial28 cited
  • 2020Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–201824 cited
  • 2023Modelling Scientific Communities17 cited
  • 2018On publication, refereeing and working hard15 cited
  • 2015A Model of the Academic Review Process with Informed Authors11 cited
  • 2018ICIS 2017 Panel Report: Break Your Shackles! Emancipating Information Systems from the Tyranny of Peer Review7 cited
  • 2015SUBMISSION DEMAND IN CORE ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A PANEL STUDY6 cited