Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy

16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995Three functions of output in second language learning1,917 cited
1996The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes1,742 cited
2003The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing1,109 cited
2006Feedback on second language students' writing1,033 cited
2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes979 cited
1999The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)856 cited
2007The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately719 cited
2004The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)679 cited
2002Treatment of error in second language student writing661 cited
1997The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision612 cited
1982Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment582 cited
1986Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality562 cited
1999The case for “The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes”: A response to Ferris516 cited
1991The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes516 cited
2000

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?

516 cited

1991An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills501 cited

Cited by

2010Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions237 cited
2015Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing217 cited
2012A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF178 cited
2019Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more174 cited
2018Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda170 cited
2018The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing165 cited
2010Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research148 cited
2019The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing113 cited
2012Research into practice: Written corrective feedback108 cited
2013Trends in Language Acquisition Research96 cited
2021Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015-201987 cited
2021Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study86 cited
2019The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback81 cited
2016Automated Essay Feedback Generation and Its Impact on Revision79 cited
2015EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom77 cited
2018The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class75 cited