Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Estimating time savings: The use of the proportion and percentage heuristics and the role of need for cognition

13 references·12 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982The need for cognition.5,357 cited
2000Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?4,263 cited
1984The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition2,911 cited
1986Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective.1,068 cited
2007Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability486 cited
2008The MPG Illusion363 cited
1999Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages310 cited
1996Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects285 cited
2003Deep thoughts and shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing effects239 cited
2003Matching Health Messages to Information-Processing Styles: Need for Cognition and Mammography Utilization131 cited
2007Decisions among time saving options: When intuition is strong and wrong68 cited
1970A functional measurement approach to intuitive estimation as exemplified by estimated time savings.48 cited
2010Exploring the time-saving bias: How drivers misestimate time saved when increasing speed29 cited

Cited by

2013The time-saving bias: Judgements, cognition and perception19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013Pace yourself: Improving time-saving judgments when increasing activity speed18 cited

2016Individual differences in Need for Cognition influence the evaluation of circular scientific explanations15 cited

2020Thinking about decisions: An integrative approach of person and task factors14 cited

2018Different heuristics and same bias: A spectral analysis of biased judgments and individual decision rules13 cited

2017Speed reductions and judgments of travel time loss: Biases and debiasing9 cited

2014Modeling and debiasing resource saving judgments8 cited

2020On the human inability to process inverse variables in intuitive judgments: different cognitive processes leading to the time loss bias6 cited

2021Biased judgments of the effects of speed change on travel time, fuel consumption and braking: Individual differences in the use of simplifying rules producing the same biases5 cited

2014Debiasing time saving judgements by manipulation of speed display1 cited

2021When two wrongs make a right: The efficiency-consumption gap under separate vs. joint evaluations1 cited

2014On physical relations in driving: judgements, cognition and perception1 cited