Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Analysis of key comparison data: critical assessment of elements of current practice with suggested improvements

16 references·6 citing·29 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography1,007 cited
2002The evaluation of key comparison data426 cited
2007The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset149 cited
2009Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons86 cited
2004Combining information from interlaboratory evaluations using a random effects model82 cited
2005Evaluation of the uncertainty of the degree of equivalence71 cited
2000Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes66 cited
2000Removing model and data non-conformity in measurement evaluation49 cited
2004On the analysis of measurement comparisons46 cited
2004Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons45 cited
2004Statistical analysis of CIPM key comparisons based on the ISOGuide43 cited
2010Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories' biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging42 cited
2002Statistical determination of a comparison reference value using hidden errors38 cited
2006ExtendingEnfor measurement science38 cited
2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Bayesian Approaches to Calculating a Reference Value in Key Comparison Experiments

36 cited

2002Combined result and associated uncertainty from interlaboratory evaluations based on the ISO Guide36 cited

Cited by

2015Explanatory power of degrees of equivalence in the presence of a random instability of the common measurand13 cited
2021Analysis of heteroscedastic measurement data by the self-refining method of interval fusion with preference aggregation – IF&PA13 cited
2016Processing Data from Interlaboratory Comparisons by the Method of Preference Aggregation12 cited
2016Transfer standard uncertainty can cause inconclusive inter-laboratory comparisons11 cited
2021The measurements results adjustment by the Least Square Method11 cited
2015Development and Study of Algorithms for Processing Inconsistent Data in Key Comparisons of Standards8 cited