SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleRe-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?

Ute Knoch2007

Article2007

Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?

Ute Knoch · Janet von Randow

112 citations·0/0 files stored·Assessing Writing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Student Assessment and Feedback

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 112 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Measuring Second Language Performance 2003Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.1998Using FACETS to model rater training effects 1995Rater characteristics and rater bias: implications for training 1983The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications 1994Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions

Cited by

2011Rater Effects on Essay Scoring: A Multilevel Analysis of Severity Drift, Central Tendency, and Rater Experience 2015The influence of training and experience on rater performance in scoring spoken language 2015ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An eye-movement study 2012Operational Rater Types in Writing Assessment: Linking Rater Cognition to Rater Behavior 2007‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence 2017A systematic review of methods for evaluating rating quality in language assessment 2011Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to rating behavior — a longitudinal study

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2008Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variabilityarticle · 5 shared references 2015Investigating rater severity/leniency in interpreter performance testingarticle · 5 shared references 2005Examining Rater Effects in TestDaF Writing and Speaking Performance Assessments: A Many-Facet Rasch Analysisarticle · 4 shared references 2008Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessmentarticle · 4 shared references 2006Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessmentarticle · 4 shared references 2015The influence of training and experience on rater performance in scoring spoken languagearticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-01-01

VenueAssessing Writing

ISSN-L1075-2935

Languageen

Citations112

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001

openalex_workW1968467642

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2015Features of difficult-to-score essays