Test-Retest Reliability of Component Process Variables Within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised

Steven Paul Woods · James Cobb Scott · Thomas D. Marcotte · Robert K. Heaton · Igor Grant

56 citations0/0 files storedAssessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Memory Processes and Influences Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

Emerging data support the construct validity of component process variables of learning and memory within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R; Brandt & Benedict, 2001); however, the test-retest reliabilities of such measures are heretofore largely unknown. This study reveals generally modest-to-low 1-year test-retest stability for several key HVLT-R component process variables (e.g., semantic clustering) in 41 healthy, younger adults. These findings are discussed in relation to issues of clinical practice and research design in neuropsychological assessment.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2009Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1998Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: Normative Data and Analysis of Inter-Form and Test-Retest Reliability 2014Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1998Practice Effects During Repeated Administrations of Memory Tests With and Without Alternate Forms 2003The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: Lessons from memory assessment 2003Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes Preliminary norms and test-retest indices 1991Alternate form of the california verbal learning test: Development and reliability

Cited by

2005Action (verb) fluency: Test–retest reliability, normative standards, and construct validity 2011Memory training and strategy use in older adults: Results from the ACTIVE study.2020Regression-Based Norms for the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure in a Portuguese Adult Population

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.