Examining the impact of reverse logistics disposition strategies

Lauren R. Skinner · Robert Glenn Richey Jr

121 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sustainable Supply Chain Management Supply Chain and Inventory Management Logistics and Transportation Systems

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this paper is to empirically examine the impact that different disposition strategies have on strategic performance in the reverse logistics process. This research also includes the role of the returns policy in the customer decision‐making process as a foundation for determining the appropriate disposition strategy. Design/methodology/approach A general review of the literature and depth interviews with logistics professionals following commonly employed investigative techniques provided the foundation for the study. A survey was developed and mailed to the senior supply chain operations professional at 400 companies in the auto parts industry resulting in 118 usable responses. Findings The current research shows that under instances of active resource commitment to reverse logistics programs, operations and supply chain managers may expect superior performance by choosing destroying, recycling, refurbishing, and/or remanufacturing of product. Practical implications If firms focus on reverse logistics activities as a must do, a strategic approach that examines outcomes rather than day‐to‐day operations is suggested. If managers do not have adequate resource support for reverse logistics, they should destroy the product. The other disposition options all require significant resources in order to reclaim value from returns. Originality/value Traditional strategy research has focused on the importance of a strategic fit between a firm's internal strengths and weaknesses and the external environment. In contrast, a resource approach stresses internal aspects of the firm. This study combines the two views along with examining the effects of resource commitment.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 121 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage 1988Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.2004Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 2006The Core Competence of the Corporation 1993The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 1993Strategic assets and organizational rent

Cited by

2015Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations 2013Reverse logistics in Malaysia: Investigating the effect of green product design and resource commitment 2016Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The Contingent role of institutional pressure 2013Supply governance structures for reverse logistics systems 2019Exploring the relationship between reverse logistics and sustainability performance 2017Key Activities, Decision Variables and Performance Indicators of Reverse Logistics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.