Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Transparency showcases strength of peer review

1 references·16 citing·54 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Opening up BMJ peer review191 cited

Cited by

2012Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science84 cited
2011Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy35 cited
2011Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review'31 cited
2011The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review31 cited
2011Expert bias in peer review30 cited
2020Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?26 cited
2023Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional20 cited
2022Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review20 cited
2010A transparent black box19 cited
2014Errors in science: the role of reviewers15 cited
2017Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles15 cited
2010Peering Into Peer Review13 cited
2014A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at S troke13 cited
2021Understanding authors' psychological reactions to peer reviews: a text mining approach

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited

2019Peer Review beyond Journals11 cited

2016Open Science als wissenschaftspolitische Problemlösungsformel?8 cited