SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts
3 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts (1990)Problems Identified by Secondary Review o…A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)A Difficult Balance: Editoria…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers (2023)Limited online training oppor…Quality in research and the significance of community assessment and peer review: education’s idiosyncrasy (2007)Quality in research and the s…The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals (2005)The Performance of Peer Revie…The Reliability of Peer Reviews of Papers on Information Systems (2004)The Reliability of Peer Revie…El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones (2002)El sistema de revisión por ex…How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems (1997)How reliable is peer review? …Improving Participation and Interrater Agreement in Scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association Abstracts (1996)Improving Participation and I…Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review (1994)Structural Transformations of…Evaluating Peer Reviews (1994)Evaluating Peer ReviewsReport of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing (1993)Report of the Ad Hoc Committe…How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? (1993)How reliable is peer review o…An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1993)An intervention to improve th…Scientific Misconduct as a Dilemma for Nursing (1992)Scientific Misconduct as a Di…Letters to the Editor 1991 (1992)Letters to the Editor 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Referee agreement in context (1991)Referee agreement in contextDesign and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1975)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Introduction to Measurement Theory (1979)The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. (1995)Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research (2009)The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline? (2015)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy (1992)The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1994)Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications (2006)Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities” (2017)Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Gender-Correlated Systematics in HST Proposal Selection (2014)Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers (2015)Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study (2022)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)El fraude en la ciencia: reflexiones a partir del caso Hwang (2007)CUERPOS ACADÉMICOS: FACTORES DE INTEGRACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN DE CONOCIMIENTO (2010)Current and Evolving Models of Peer Review (2014)The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments (1975)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (1991)Quality of Abstracts Describing Randomized Trials in the Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology Meetings: Guidelines for Improved Reporting (2004)Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported? (2005)The International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (2006)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Judging the judges: the role of journal editors (2002)Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate (2009)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (1993)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited

Cited by

  • 1994Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review64 cited
  • 1993How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts?62 cited
  • 2002El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones60 cited
  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 1993An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry52 cited
  • 1997How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems48 cited
  • 1994Evaluating Peer Reviews39 cited
  • 2004The Reliability of Peer Reviews of Papers on Information Systems31 cited
  • 1993Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing21 cited
  • 1996Improving Participation and Interrater Agreement in Scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association Abstracts21 cited
  • 1992Scientific Misconduct as a Dilemma for Nursing

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2023Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers16 cited
  • 1992Letters to the Editor 199116 cited
  • 1991Referee agreement in context12 cited
  • 2005The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals11 cited
  • 2007Quality in research and the significance of community assessment and peer review: education’s idiosyncrasy9 cited