Validity of the peabody picture vocabulary test-revised with mentally retarded adults

H. Thompson Prout · Julie Favreau Schwartz

18 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Clinical Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

Investigated the validity of using the PPVT -R with mildly mentally retarded adults. The PPVT -R, PPVT , and WAIS-R were administered to 21 Ss, and WAIS scores were obtained from client files. Results indicated that the revised Peabody tended to yield significantly lower estimates of functioning than did the other measures. Implications are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: An Appraisal and Review 1981Comparison of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised for a Referred Population

Cited by

2001Comparison of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Third Edition and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition with university students 1986Comparison of the PPVT-R and WAIS-R in state hospital psychiatric patients 1986Alternate form reliability and concurrent validity of the PPVT-R for referred rehabilitation agency adults 2016PPVT-I administration rules significantly shorten PPVT-III/IV administration

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.